BackChannel
June 19, 2013, 11:59:32 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Join us LIVE every Wednesday at 4 pm PST on Indie Intertube
 
   Home   Help Calendar Tags Login Register Chat  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Share this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on MySpaceShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on SquidooShare this topic on TwitterShare this topic on YahooShare this topic on Google buzz
Author Topic: Wiki Leaks and Other Journalism  (Read 606 times)
Shadhavar
Chimera
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 150


I know you. If I were blind I'd know what you are


WWW
« on: August 11, 2010, 07:58:45 PM »

What're your thoughts concerning the as they've stated "old journalistic judgement is still needed with new media technologies" concerning WikiLeaks and the New York Times and the current debate of how seriously to consider national-security interests in the new media space?

Read the original article
Logged

Heroes know that things must happen when it is time for them to happen. A quest may not simply be abandoned; unicorns may go unrescued for a long time, but not forever; a happy ending cannot come in the middle of the story.   Follow Me
MarkGardner
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


My ride


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2010, 10:27:27 AM »

OOOO now this topic could get fun. And I may personally be in a minority in the space, but I feel national security issues should be considered. The problem is in the definition of what is a risk to national security.

Exposing CIA operatives could be (and I think it is) defined as a risk to national security. Not to mention personal safety. I actually know a person who used to be in a leadership position with the CIA. At one point she had several hits on her from cartels and other agencies because of her work with the CIA. Exposing someone in that situation could not only be considered a risk to national security but definitely a risk to personal safety. Not to mention the safety of their families.

On the flip side, I'm betting that at the time Nixon thought release of the Watergate Tapes was a threat to national security. Should they not have been released? I think of course they should have been released.

This is where I think the new media world should work with old media sensibilities about verifying their information, weighing the possible effects of their reporting, finding the "story," researching leads, etc. By taking the TIME to consider their stories and slow down, they can make an educated judgement about the effects of their reporting. That's really important now more than ever since so many people get their information from the internet. So many sites just put stuff up without thinking. I just found out that people are now saying there really is a Barack Obama born in Hawaii, but that person died and our current President is a Kenyan who stole his identity. REally?? And people are believing this. With absolutely NO foundation or fact to support it.

As long as people go to the internet for information, new media journalists have a responsibility to do their due diligence in their reporting. Without that concern for not only the truth but for the impact of their stories, they are (in my opinion only) doing everyone a disservice. The internet has the potential to bring people together, but can just as easily tear them apart.

I'm rambling
Logged

Let's go over the rules. Rule number one: No hitting me in the face
http://www.cellthewebseries.com
Tags: news  wiki  internet  journalism 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.12 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!